Google

Friday, March 28, 2025

Is Bryan Johnson a Fraud or a Charlatan or neiter?

So this is a difficult question, mostly because I was extremely into what he was doing when I first learned about blue print.  So first off let's not confuse Bryan Johnson with Brian Johnson (the liver king) who absolutely was a fraud, because he was doing a lot of illegal stuff to get jacked and pawning it off as his own work outs and diet.  So Blueprint Bryan Johnson has similar claims related to diet and workouts, but he has documented everything he did and shared all his measurements.  And I was fully on board, until I took a step back after he started coming out with a bunch of products.  He also complains openly about being in the food business even though this was a completely "optional" decision.  Right?  I think the path Bryan has taken has been the long game, which is really odd for someone who is a fraud.  Because normally fraudsters have the solution before they fully identify the problem.  Bryan went through the steps to fully identify the problem and develop a solution.  Even though the general population has never asked for it.  But now he has become a salesmen for his product.  In the preceeding 2 or 3 years, Bryan was developing the methodology to increase life span or more accurately decreasing his aging rate, based on the Dunedin Pace method.  His company now also sells a test that will tell you your aging rate, convenient.  So he is a fraud for selling things that he has developed a market for?  Not really, at least in my opinion. Eating well, exercising and sleep are all things everyone should try and optimize for themselves so that we can all be our best version.  That being said, tying it all to longevity maybe a stretch.

But is he a charlatan? I think the answer to this is more likely yes, even though part of the definition says fraud.  Maybe intellectually dishonest is more fitting?  Now everything he has espoused has been positive for the most part. He does disparage other products or chocolates that don't do the same rigorous testing that he does, which is fair, but keep in mind he wants you to buy his stuff even if he says he does or it doesn't matter.  I keep coming back to the issues he had with his ex-girl friend.  Basically she got cancer, he kicked her out because "it was bad for the brand", and she sued because they had a working relationship.  Now Bryan won the case, but there have been some shady accounts of what happened in this relationship and maybe in some of his business dealings as well.  All of this is just alleged at this point as I have no dog in the fight so aren't willing to dig too deep here.  But Bryan is someone who dropped out of the Church (mormon or LDS) and I believe that was close to when he hit the big payday when he sold Venmo to paypal ~ 2013ish.  Not too big of an issue there, sometimes people go through things and find themselves, but if you don't have guiding principles like a religious backing, then how do you base the dealings with other people in in your personal life?  Are you being an honest good person just because?  The crazy thing is there is basically zero mention of his first wife or 2 of his kids on the internet.  You would think someone that famous, that rich, would have a digital imprint somewhere of who he was married to or who is kids are.  But oddly not this guy.  Not the guy who has spent the last 2-3 years building an influencer base, doing tons of interviews, making a bunch of videos.  Nope, I guess no one cares or she is so smart she has stayed out of the public eye.  I find it odd that no one has attempted to interview her and get her thoughts on Bryan's transition, especially since he divorced her when there were still 3 kids at home.  And that is where the intellectual dishonesty comes in.  Why does someone that wants to share so much with everyone have these deep secrets that are never discussed or discussed only by him in in seemingly positive circumstance for how he was able to break free and improve himself?  

I'm gradually coming to the conclusion that everyone in the "Longevity Space" is selling something and being intellectually dishonest to some point.  It is less about being altruistic and helping people and more about making money.  That is a sad reality for something that I had such high hopes for.  People have always been on the search for the fountain of youth and that is what makes things seem so promising when someone proclaims to have something.  The bad thing is, even if the stuff Bryan is doing works and guarantees him another 50 years or more of life, I won't see it.  I won't be able to sit there and say "I told you so" because I'll be gone before it.  So how do we get people on the same page and doing the "right things".  Not sure, because in the end I don't know what the "right things" are, because it is hard to know what to trust.  I think that the first step, honestly, is just acknowledging that there isn't one way to do things or you have to live a life where 8-10 hours of the day are dedicated to living longer, because what are you adding at that point.  More days where a third or half of you time is filled doing menial tasks to keep you alive?  Some people would say that isn't living, but I think there is a happy medium.  In the last year, I have changed my diet, started taking supplements and increased my activity level to the point where I am probably in the best shape of my life (maybe not thinnest, but strongest and fastest).  I think that is the real goal, to improve health span, even if we can't improve life span.  We should want to be as strong and flexible as we can be for as long as possible, so that we can retain our independence and take care of ourselves.  I hated watching my mom, waste away at the end of her life and gradually succumbing to an infection.  She was in pretty good shape until around 91 and things went down hill pretty fast, then it was a difficult 4 years.  So what is a good life span? 95% of your life, 98%, 99%?  I would say Mom was at about 93-94% and that is out of 95 years.  Now the bad news is that her savings was gone in a little over 2 years of that difficult living, so there are financial things to tackle as well as health.  But the better you feel and move the longer you can be on your own, the more you can travel and do things in retirement and ultimately the more fun you can have.  

So my final conclusion is this, I think Bryan Johnson has done some things to pinpoint the goals for improving health span, which is kind of the old trope of eat right and exercise.  But he has also added sleep and hitting certain supplements.  I think Bryan had a plan all along to make a saleable product and after a lot of guerilla style marketing of himself and his protocols he has something he can cash in on.  Is it the end all be all? Doubtful.  He could be right, but me and the people criticizing his methods will never be around to get called out for being wrong.  I think he has been a little disingenuous with his true motives and recently the things that have come out about him make me question who's interests he really has in mind (his or the human condition).  Kudos to him though for working the last 4 years and getting into incredible shape, that at least provides hope for people that have made it to 40 without doing a whole lot that they can turn it around and get healthy.  I think trying to be healthy does cost something, be it time or money, but I can't look at what he is pushing and say that if you want to live longer it is the only way.  There was a woman that did his program for 180 days and her aging went from 0.93 to 0.95.  It actually went up and she did the whole thing.  Not the most promising result.  I haven't followed him exactly, but I have improved over the last year.  I think the important thing is to balance improvement with actually living life, that would be my only advice.  Try and be the best you can, but don't sacrifice everything around you for some selfish goal.  The idea is to work hard enough to be of value to someone else and give back to others.  Best of luck and strive for progress, not perfection.

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

The Great Seed Oil Debate

There is a lot of hype around seed oils right now and their alternatives.  I recently switched my egg cooking routine to include bacon grease instead of vegetable oil spray, but I didn't really understand the methodology behind it.  Vegetable oils have omega-6 fatty acids in them.  You actually need some of these, around 5-10% of your calorie intake, so in a 2,000 calorie diet somewhere between 100-200 calories. The other piece is it needs to be balanced with omega-3's in a 4:1 ratio of omega-6:omega-3.  At a minimum you should get around 7 g per day of Omega-6 because the body doesn't make these.  Now the good news is people were able to get this for hundreds of years without the help of proceed seed oils.  The bad news is there is so much seed oil now that almost everything that is packaged has it in and probably about every restaurant you go to is cooking in it.  So I ask AI some questions and since it is non-biased yet, because the oil companies haven't figured out to pay the AI like they do people doing "research" here are some answers.

Here's what happens when omega-6 intake is too high:

Inflammatory Effects:

  • Converts to pro-inflammatory compounds
  • Can increase systemic inflammation
  • May amplify existing inflammatory conditions
  • Competes with anti-inflammatory omega-3s

Health Impacts:

  • May increase cardiovascular risk
  • Can contribute to chronic pain
  • Potentially affects mental health
  • Could promote weight gain
  • May impact skin health
  • Could affect joint function

Cellular Effects:

  • Changes cell membrane composition
  • Can affect cellular signaling
  • Impacts hormone production
  • May increase oxidative stress

Long-term Concerns:

  • Could contribute to chronic diseases
  • May accelerate aging processes
  • Potential impact on brain health
  • Might affect immune system function

 Remember the key here is the ratio with omega-3.  Because the seed oils are in everything it is easy to get behind in the ratio.  Now since we know we need omega-6 and we know that seed oils actually provide that.  Why are they considered "bad" by many?  Went back to AI here from some unbiased info:

Here's why vegetable oils can be problematic:

Processing Issues:

  • Highly refined using chemicals
  • Heated at high temperatures
  • Deodorized to mask rancidity
  • Often extracted using hexane
  • Requires industrial processing (not natural)

Health Concerns:

  • Extremely high omega-6 content disrupts omega-3:6 balance
  • Unstable when heated (oxidizes easily)
  • Creates harmful compounds when heated:
    • Trans fats
    • Aldehydes
    • Free radicals
  • Can promote inflammation
  • Often rancid before purchase

Modern Diet Impact:

  • Never existed in human diet before 1900s
  • Now in most processed foods
  • Hidden in restaurant meals
  • Used for most deep frying
  • Found in most packaged snacks

Environmental Impact:

  • Requires intensive farming
  • Often GMO crops
  • High pesticide use
  • Large carbon footprint

So there you go.  Now am I saying you need to quit seed oils?  No, and unfortunately unless you made all of your food or sourced it locally it is almost completely unavoidable if you like to eat... anything...at all. Just check the label of whatever it is you are about to eat and it likely says "vegetable oil".  Now some are probably less bad for you, but the basic mechanism is a seed is broken down for the oil.  And this seed would not be bio-available under normal circumstances.  You have to heat it, hit it with solvent and do some other processing to get this oil out of the seed.  Unfortunately our western diets are saturated with this oil, and the only thing we can do is try and eat a little healthier until the government comes in and tightens up the food sources we eat or restaurants start advertising alternatives like Steak and Shake.  Yes, as of 2025 their fries are still pre-cooked in vegetable oil, but in the stores they are using beef tallow.  While not a super healthy alternative it does provide at least a decrease in the amount of omega-6's you intake.  (tallow is omega-3 rich, so may help balance the system, at least from a fat standpoint)  There is a lot of work to do and a lot of education to do as well.  Hope this helps at little for now.   

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

New Routine for March

Got my blood work back from my physical and numbers are still good, TC-187, LDL-108, HDL-65, TriG-77 (lowest it has been).  Similar to where they were last September, which was a step change down of almost 40 on total C, down 30 on LDL and up 10 on HDL.  I've done some research now for the AMPK cycle and basically it is the longevity energy cycle.  It lets the body flush out the old junk and kind of helps it repair.  Over the next 4 weeks I have a similar schedule as far as down days and days I can be active.  I'm going to use this month to try and schedule a couple of days of AMPK a week where I focus mainly on recovery.  It will require me to switch things up a bit as far as my morning routine, but I maybe able to parlay it into more sleep.  We'll see how it goes, the future maybe AMPK days combined, but for now we'll see how this works.  Generated with the help of AI:

MONDAY (LIFTING/mTOR FOCUS) Eating Window: 12pm-9pm

  • 12pm: Break fast - CoQ10 (200mg) + Resveratrol (500mg)
  • 12pm-4pm: Main nutrition
  • 6:30-7:30pm: Lifting
  • 8pm-9pm: Post-workout meal
  • 9pm: Begin fast (No berberine - protect mTOR activation)

TUESDAY (FLEX DAY) Option A - AMPK Focus: Eating Window: 10am-6pm

  • Morning: CoQ10 (200mg)
  • 9:30am: Berberine (500mg)
  • 10am: Break fast
  • 1pm: Resveratrol (500mg) + Berberine (500mg)
  • 5pm: Berberine (500mg)
  • 6pm: End eating window

Option B - If Training: Follow Monday or Wednesday schedule based on activity type

WEDNESDAY (EVENING CARDIO) Eating Window: 11am-8:30pm

  • Morning: Resveratrol (500mg) + CoQ10 (200mg)
  • 10:30am: Berberine (500mg)
  • 11am: First meal
  • 2pm: Berberine (500mg) [removed this one because the first run felt sluggish]
  • 4pm: Light meal/snack
  • 6-6:30pm: Cardio session
  • 7:30-8:30pm: Post-cardio meal (no berberine)
  • 8:30pm: Begin fast

THURSDAY (LIFTING) Same as Monday schedule

FRIDAY (CARDIO or REST) If Cardio: Follow Wednesday schedule If Rest: Follow Tuesday Option A

SATURDAY (FLEX DAY) Eating Window: 7am-6pm Option A - AMPK Focus:

  • 6:30am: CoQ10 (200mg)
  • 6:45am: Berberine (500mg)
  • 7am: First meal
  • 10am: Resveratrol (500mg)
  • 2pm: Berberine (500mg)
  • 5:30pm: Final meal + Berberine (500mg)
  • 6pm: Begin fast

Option B - If Training:

  • 6:30am: CoQ10 (200mg)
  • 7am: First meal
  • 10am: Resveratrol (500mg)
  • Mid-day: Training if planned
  • 5:30pm: Final meal
  • 6pm: Begin fast (Skip berberine if training)

SUNDAY (CARDIO) Eating Window: 10am-7:30pm

  • Morning (fasted): Resveratrol (500mg) + CoQ10 (200mg)
  • 9:30am: Single Berberine (500mg)
  • 10am: Break fast/First meal
  • 2-4pm: Light meal/snack
  • 6-6:30pm: Cardio session
  • 7-7:30pm: Post-cardio meal
  • 7:30pm: Begin fast

Key Features:

  • Lifting days protected from AMPK activation
  • Flexible windows for required schedules
  • Strategic berberine timing
  • Post-workout nutrition windows
  • Appropriate fasting periods
  • Sunday setup for Monday lifting
  • Two flex days for adaptation

Key Features:

  • Two strong AMPK focus days (Tuesday/Saturday)
  • Two mTOR-dominant lifting days (Monday/Thursday)
  • Three cardio/moderate days
  • Dihydroberberine maximized on rest days
  • Lifting days protected from AMPK activation
  • Shorter eating windows on rest days
  • Longer eating windows on training days